Deconstructing paternalism--what serves the patient best?
نویسنده
چکیده
On the motion that "medical paternalism serves the patient best", this essay reviews current arguments on medical paternalism vs. patient autonomy. Citing medico-ethical texts and journals and selected real-life applications like electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and the advanced medical directive (AMD), the essay argues that medical paternalism cannot serve the patient best insofar as current debates limit themselves to "who" wields the decision-making power. Such debates side-step "what" the patient's best interests are. The essay further argues through the case of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and acupuncture in particular, that the current dominant Western school of thought excludes other forms of "alternative" treatment through medical paternalism.
منابع مشابه
Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.
This paper argues that doctors ought to make all things considered value judgments about what is best for their patients. It illustrates some of the shortcomings of the model of doctor as 'fact-provider'. The 'fact-provider' model fails to take account of the fact that practising medicine necessarily involves making value judgments; that medical practice is a moral practice and requires that do...
متن کاملPaternalism in mental health: time for rehabilitation?
Mental health legislation has received enormous attention internationally in the era of deinstitutionalization, particularly as societies become more risk averse. The response has been framed within a libertarian tradition and the language is almost exclusively about autonomy and partnership. Apart from risk, patient autonomy has gone from being one of the principles in the discourse surroundin...
متن کاملPsychiatric paternalism between Scylla and Charybdis
As much as strong medical paternalism should never be exercised, some weak paternalism towards patients is, on the contrary, part of physicians' and society's moral obligation. So far, this is a widely consented position in medical ethics. What then are the defining and the justifying conditions for legitimate weak paternalism in psychiatry? In this presentation it is argued in favor of three n...
متن کاملEthical considerations for the development of Decision Support Systems
This paper is extracted from a dissertation submitted as part of the MA in Medical Ethics at Keele University 2004. 1 Introduction Decision making in the doctor-patient relationship will inevitably be a balance between the patient's right to control his or her own life (" autonomy ") and the doctor's duty to choose and prescribe the best course of treatment for the patient (" paternalism ") 1. ...
متن کامل“Nudge” in the clinical consultation – an acceptable form of medical paternalism?
BACKGROUND Libertarian paternalism is a concept derived from cognitive psychology and behavioural science. It is behind policies that frame information in such a way as to encourage individuals to make choices which are in their best interests, while maintaining their freedom of choice. Clinicians may view their clinical consultations as far removed from the realms of cognitive psychology but o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Singapore medical journal
دوره 43 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002